Saturday, 23 October 2010
Map Marathon
Serpentine Gallery hosts a project titled 'Map Marathon' during the Frieze Art Fair week. I love this real multi-disciplinary approach, including poets, writers, philosophers, scholars, musicians, architects, designers and scientists among the visual artists.
http://www.serpentinegallery.org/2010/10/this_weekendmap_marathonsaturd.html
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
Conversation: Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev and Daniel Birnbaum
The on-going exhibition in Portikus is by GUILLERMO FAIVOVICH & NICOLÁS GOLDBERG.
http://portikus.de/9.html?&L=1
Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev and Daniel Birnbaum talks about the work.
CCB: Are we sure of anything? Are we sure that we are “we” because we know we shall die, and because we have language? What is an artwork according to you?
DB: Well, I doubt that I can give you a satisfactory definition of the notion of “art” right away. But I am quite convinced that this cosmic readymade will be accepted as a work of art—and a pretty great one at that. There is a rather recent book titled After Finitude by the French philosopher Quentin Meillassoux that would be worth mentioning here. He talks about objects that are so ancient that they precede not only humanity and intelligent life on the planet, but also any form of life known to us. He asks what these objects might have to say about our modern philosophical tradition, which takes subjectivity and language as its starting point. For him, the fact that we have these objects and can make scientific statements about them forces us beyond an insistence on finitude that is typical of modern thinking after Kant. The meteorite could be an example…
CCB: Yes, it could, if one looks at it from the point of view of time. However, Karl Marx, in “The Meteors,” the fifth chapter of his doctoral dissertation, uses the theory of celestial bodies of Epicurus to argue almost the opposite. To him, understanding the materiality of meteorites allows one to avoid any belief in the unknowable and the infinite: “The heavenly bodies are the supreme realization of weight. In them all antinomies between form and matter, between concept and existence, which constituted the development of the atom, are resolved; in them, all required determinations are realized”. One way or another, the Campo del Cielo meteorite field 1,200 kilometers north of Buenos Aires in Argentina was known from time immemorial to the pre-Columbian inhabitants of the region and since the late sixteenth century to the Spanish, although only in the late 1700s were scientists convinced that meteorites fell from the sky and were not rocks coming from the earth’s core.
DB: One last question. With this exhibition we are trying to rejoin what belongs together. But, of course, our rock is still in two parts. Do you see this as a tragic work?
CCB: I see the reunification of El Taco meteorite, from Campo del Cielo, as a joyous work that celebrates—at least provisionally—the possibility of reintegration. The fact that it gets divided again, at the end of the exhibition, just means that art could be a lot better than life.
http://portikus.de/9.html?&L=1
Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev and Daniel Birnbaum talks about the work.
CCB: Are we sure of anything? Are we sure that we are “we” because we know we shall die, and because we have language? What is an artwork according to you?
DB: Well, I doubt that I can give you a satisfactory definition of the notion of “art” right away. But I am quite convinced that this cosmic readymade will be accepted as a work of art—and a pretty great one at that. There is a rather recent book titled After Finitude by the French philosopher Quentin Meillassoux that would be worth mentioning here. He talks about objects that are so ancient that they precede not only humanity and intelligent life on the planet, but also any form of life known to us. He asks what these objects might have to say about our modern philosophical tradition, which takes subjectivity and language as its starting point. For him, the fact that we have these objects and can make scientific statements about them forces us beyond an insistence on finitude that is typical of modern thinking after Kant. The meteorite could be an example…
CCB: Yes, it could, if one looks at it from the point of view of time. However, Karl Marx, in “The Meteors,” the fifth chapter of his doctoral dissertation, uses the theory of celestial bodies of Epicurus to argue almost the opposite. To him, understanding the materiality of meteorites allows one to avoid any belief in the unknowable and the infinite: “The heavenly bodies are the supreme realization of weight. In them all antinomies between form and matter, between concept and existence, which constituted the development of the atom, are resolved; in them, all required determinations are realized”. One way or another, the Campo del Cielo meteorite field 1,200 kilometers north of Buenos Aires in Argentina was known from time immemorial to the pre-Columbian inhabitants of the region and since the late sixteenth century to the Spanish, although only in the late 1700s were scientists convinced that meteorites fell from the sky and were not rocks coming from the earth’s core.
DB: One last question. With this exhibition we are trying to rejoin what belongs together. But, of course, our rock is still in two parts. Do you see this as a tragic work?
CCB: I see the reunification of El Taco meteorite, from Campo del Cielo, as a joyous work that celebrates—at least provisionally—the possibility of reintegration. The fact that it gets divided again, at the end of the exhibition, just means that art could be a lot better than life.
Sunday, 17 October 2010
after68s
http://www.after1968.org/
after 68s..
or after berlin wall fall.
always referring the historical events.
to create a statement.
after 68s..
or after berlin wall fall.
always referring the historical events.
to create a statement.
The End(s) of the Museum
Early morning, I was checking the lecture's list for this term at school, and I came across a name 'Thomas Keenan' who serves as a curator and prof. on literature and human rights. While I was thinkin that it is a brilliant idea to bring Keenan for a lecture, at the same time I was googling one the books he co-edited, titled 'The End(s) of the Museum' and ended up finding this article. let's remember 90s..while MMK questions and makes series of lectures named 'Production of Museum' It is still a vivid topic to comment..
The End(s) of the Museum is a concerted collective attempt to come to grips with the questions of what the museum has been and done in the West, and where it might be going. Is the Museum as we have experienced it coming to an end? Has it outlived its definitions - from classical to postmodern - and, if so, what might become of it ?
John G. Hanhardt (Curator), Thomas Keenan (Curator)
With Janine Antoni, Christian Boltanski, Marcel Broodthaers, Sophie Calle, Bill Fontana, Joan Fontcuberta, Andrea Fraser, Dan Graham, Jamelie Hassan, Ilya Kabakov, Louise Lawler, Antoni Muntadas, Julia Scher, Francesc Torres
Organised by Fundació Antoni Tàpies, Barcelona
Of course, a reflexion on the possible disappearance of the museum cannot be separated from an examination of its aims and purposes, its ends. The exhibition and symposium are opportunities for rigorous and adventurous, artistic and theoretical speculation on an extremely challenging topic, one which holds within it the question of nothing less than the memory and the promise of our culture.
But "our" culture and "the" museum - as an institution, an idea and a practice - are not, could not be, just one thing. In fact, what is most interesting are the ways in which this situation has developed into an expression of multiple desires and goals which now, more than ever, seem at odds with one another. Classically, the museum was oriented toward the preservation and conservation of the canon of art history and aesthetics. Modernism gave it the task of embodying the utopian and recuperative power of art, and expanded our notions of what belonged in a museum. Today, the museum often seeks to become a space where a new community of cultures and histories challenges inherited aesthetic paradigms. These heterogeneous definitions and intentions have not simply succeeded one another, but instead often co-exist in an institution that envisions itself as directed toward the fulfillment of them all.
The End(s) of the Museum does not pretend to imagine a museum of the future, nor to recall nostalgically what the museum once was or might have been. Instead it is a sustained theoretical and critical inquiry into the genealogy of the museum. This implies not so much a search for the roots of the museum, as if history were only a continuous development from an origin, but a rigorous theoretical investigation of the museum as an historical artifact. What are the epistemological presuppositions of this institution, which is also to say, what are its social, economic and political stakes? The End(s) of the Museum aims neither to describe situations nor to prescribe solutions but rather to analyze the ways in which the museum is imagined within and without the histories and institutions which have overdetermined it. In deconstructing the locus of the museum in Western art and culture, we hope to provide the conceptual tools to redefine, and thus enable a new theory of, this project called the museum.
The End(s) of the Museum includes work by fourteen artists. Some of them have created work especially for this exhibit, others are showing previous work relevant to the questions raised by the exhibition.
http://www.fundaciotapies.org/site/spip.php?rubrique462
a happy level playing
'And the idea of a happy level playing field between artists and curators is indeed far too pastoral.' says Tirdad Zolghadr. Is that so?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)